Noun

Singular natural selection

Plural uncountable

natural selection (uncountable)

  1. (evolutionary biology) A process by which heritable traits conferring survival and reproductive advantage to individuals, or related individuals, tend to be passed on to succeeding generations and become more frequent in a population, whereas other less favourable traits tend to become eliminated.
  2. (quantitative genetics) A process in which individual organisms or phenotypes that possess favourable traits are more likely to survive and reproduce: the differential survival and reproduction of phenotypes.

From Wiktionary under the GNU Free Documentation License.
Mon Apr 12 16:29:04 2010

Natural selection is a natural law by which genetically heritable traits become more or less common in a population over successive generations. This selection in interaction with the production of variation, the possible genetic fixation process and possibly, in several cases, whith little epigenetic process determine the evolution of the species.

The natural genetic variation within a population of organisms means that some individuals will survive and reproduce more successfully than others in their current environment. For example, the peppered moth exists in both light and dark colors in the United Kingdom, but during the industrial revolution many of the trees on which the moths rested became blackened by soot, giving the dark-colored moths an advantage in hiding from predators. This gave dark-colored moths a better chance of surviving to produce dark-colored offspring, and in just a few generations the majority of the moths were dark. Factors which affect reproductive success are also important, an issue which Charles Darwin developed in his ideas on sexual selection.

Natural selection acts on the phenotype, or the observable characteristics of an organism, but the genetic (heritable) basis of any phenotype which gives a reproductive advantage will become more common in a population (see allele frequency). Over time, this process can result in adaptations that specialize populations for particular ecological niches and may eventually result in the emergence of new species. In other words, natural selection is an important process (though not the only process) by which evolution takes place within a population of organisms. As opposed to artificial selection, in which humans favor specific traits, in natural selection the environment acts as a sieve through which only certain variations can pass.

Natural selection is one of the cornerstones of modern biology. The term was introduced by Darwin in his influential 1859 book On the Origin of Species, in which natural selection was described as analogous to artificial selection, a process by which animals and plants with traits considered desirable by human breeders are systematically favored for reproduction. The concept of natural selection was originally developed in the absence of a valid theory of heredity; at the time of Darwin's writing, nothing was known of modern genetics. The union of traditional Darwinian evolution with subsequent discoveries in classical and molecular genetics is termed the modern evolutionary synthesis. Natural selection remains the primary explanation for adaptive evolution.

From Wikipedia under the GNU Free Documentation License
Fri Sep 3 22:15:56 2010

Denim and Tweed: The "Big Four," part I: Natural selection
denimandtweed.com
Denim and Tweed: The "Big Four," part I: Natural selection

(Jeremy)

Wed, 12 May 2010 14:05:00 GM

This post was chosen as an Editor's Selection for ResearchBloggin​g.org Among non-biologists,​ the best-known of the Big Four forces of evolution is almost certainly . natural selection. . We've all heard the catchphrase "survival of the ...

From Google Blog Search: "natural selection"
Fri Sep 3 22:15:58 2010

Galileo's one giant step a vast leap ... - Toronto Star
news.google.com
Galileo's one giant step a vast leap to `multiverse'

Toronto Star

... is (along with Darwin's discovery of evolution by natural selection ) the biggest revolution in self-knowledge that mankind has undergone. ...



and more »
Dawn at the Museum - New York Times
news.google.com
Dawn at the Museum

New York Times

A few months earlier, Darwin had published On the Origin of Species, in which he presented extensive evidence for evolution by natural selection and ...
Puberty on the Scale of a Planet - New York Times
news.google.com
Puberty on the Scale of a Planet

New York Times

And, through the use of pesticides, genetic manipulation and antibiotics, humans are now said to be the dominant influence on natural selection , ...

From Google News Search: "natural selection"
Fri Sep 3 22:15:58 2010

How did natural selection 'create' bones that can heal themselves when fractured or broken?
Q. I am not a creationist. This is just a question. When I was 7 years old, I broke my left leg. They put a cast on it and within a few months it had healed. After a second, smaller cast was on it for a few weeks my leg was as good as new. I've hardly thought about it very much over the years. It would seem that in nature if an animal broke a bone that it would be the end for them. How could self-repairing broken bones come about by natural selection?
Asked by Chelsea - Mon Oct 20 18:07:48 2008 - - 3 Answers - 0 Comments

A. There are numerous fossil bones that show evidence of healing. Many fractures are not badly displaced and will heal well enough for an animal to survive. Technology has increased the percentage of fractures that can be survived, but healing was an advantage even in the minor ones.
Answered by novangelis - Mon Oct 20 18:43:47 2008

How about natural selection and the peppered moth observations?
Q. Some "authorities" cite the peppered moth observations by Kettleworth as sufficient to explain how natural selection is a creative force which can encourage near-miraculous developments (such as the evolution of the kidney or reproductive systems). It is thought that the peppered moth phenomenon (industrial melanism) prove the whole theory of evolution. Is this reasonable? Isaac Asimov for one, in his "New Guide to Science."
Asked by Jack - Tue Nov 20 00:11:45 2007 - - 4 Answers - 0 Comments

A. Industrial Melanism and the Peppered Moth are not by themselves sufficient evidence to say that the theory of evolution by natural selection is proved. (of course, in science *nothing* is ever proved, only demonstrated to be likely or possible). However, in combination with all the other evidence for evolution (fossils, comparative anatomy, comparative genetics, comparative embryology, other observed instances of evolution) there is strong evidence that evolution is the best model to describe the way the natural world operates.
Answered by gribbling - Tue Nov 20 06:35:53 2007

Why do people associate natural selection with random chance?
Q. Evolution, and natural selection because of that, is in no way random. People keep saying that if you believe in natural selection, then you believe that 'this all happened by chance'... bullcrap... It's natural selection. It's natural because it occurs naturally, but it is still selection. It can't be random if it's selective... So, to answer you, NO, scientists do not think that this all came about by chance. It came about by gravity and natural selection.
Asked by Noki Slovlaklovich - Mon Nov 3 17:22:06 2008 - - 3 Answers - 0 Comments

A. From what I can see it is because they do not understand the entire scientific process. They do not know the meaning of a scientific theory, and they do not understand what it mean to say from what we can tell now mutations occur seemingly randomly. They do not understand that just because we do not have all the answers yet, it does not mean we are wrong just still working on it. They assume that because the bible has all the answers (or so they believe) and science does not, that religion must be correct... It is a very ignorant way to look at the world, I would love to see the day when religion is kept privately from government and science, but I really doubt these people will learn to keep their ignorant views to themself.
Answered by Hugh G. Rection - Tue Nov 4 15:25:29 2008

From Yahoo Answer Search: "natural selection"
Fri Sep 3 22:15:59 2010